Knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors of dysphagia clinicians regarding oral health-An international study.

AIM: The aim of this study was to investigate the knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors of dysphagia clinicians regarding oral health care. METHODOLOGY AND RESULTS: An 11-question and 37-statement survey inquiring the clinicians' descriptive information, knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors related to oral health was administered via Google forms. A total of 234 dysphagia clinicians responded on behalf of themselves. The findings showed that 41.5% (n = 97) of the clinicians had a high level of knowledge about oral health. There was a significant relationship between the level of oral health knowledge and the clinicians' oral health education (p < .05). A percentage of 6.4 (n = 15) of the clinicians had a high level of attitude toward oral health. Oral health education status of clinicians and their profession was significantly related to the attitude toward oral health (p < .05). Most of the clinicians (44.0%, n = 103) had low behavior level. The level of behavior was significantly associated with status of receiving oral health education, their professions, duration of experience, and institution (p < .05). CONCLUSIONS: The study showed that clinicians exhibit moderate mean knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors scores, and these states are significantly associated with oral health education. This can serve as a stimulus for clinicians caring for dysphagia patients to receive oral health education during their university education.

Dynamic Imaging Grade of Swallowing Toxicity in Children with Esophageal Atresia.

INTRODUCTION: The Dynamic Imaging Grade of Swallowing Toxicity (DIGEST) scale was developed to evaluate the safety, efficiency, and overall pharyngeal swallowing performance in patients with dysphagia (DIGESTs, DIGESTe, and DIGESTt, respectively). Although various types of swallowing dysfunction are encountered in children with esophageal atresia (EA), oropharyngeal dysphagia poses risk for aspiration. Therefore, a retrospective study was performed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of swallowing by using DIGEST score in children with EA. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-nine EA patients were included. The demographic features, respiratory problems, results, and outcomes of surgical treatment were evaluated from medical records. The videofluoroscopic swallowing evaluation investigated for both airway protection and bolus residuals at the level of vallecula, posterior pharyngeal wall, and pyriform sinus at liquid and pudding consistencies. The penetration and aspiration scale (PAS) was used to define penetration and aspiration severity, and DIGEST was used to evaluate DIGESTs, DIGESTe, and DIGESTt. RESULTS: The median age of the patients were 13 months (7-39 months), and male-to-female ratio was 25:14. Sixty-seven percent of patients were type-C EA and 61% of them has associated anomalies; 38% of patients had aspiration (PAS = 6-8) in liquids and 10% in pudding consistency. Life-threatening/profound swallowing dysfunction in DIGESTe (DIGEST = 4) was seen in 13% (n = 5) of patients; 40% of EA patients showed severe problems in DIGESTt. CONCLUSION: DIGEST is a valid and reliable tool to define the efficacy and safety of swallowing in children with EA.

The Role of Bolus Residue and Its Relation with Respiratory Problems in Children with Esophageal Atresia.

Bolus residue is significant risk factor for postswallow aspiration. A retrospective study was performed to evaluate the role of bolus residue and its relation with respiratory problems in children with esophageal atresia. Children were evaluated for demographic features, type of esophageal atresia, associated anomalies, and respiratory problems. The videofluoroscopic swallowing evaluation (VFSE) was performed, and scored by using the penetration aspiration scale (PAS), bolus residual score (BRS) and normalized residual ratio scale (NRRS). Children with and without respiratory problems were also compared in terms of aspiration and bolus residue. Forty-one children with a median age of 15 months (1-138 months), male:female ratio of 26:15 was included. 65.9% (n = 27) of children were type-C and 24.4% (n = 10) were type-A EA. In 61% (n = 25) of children had liquid aspiration (PAS ≥ 6) and 9.8% (n = 4) had aspiration in pudding consistencies. Children with aspiration in liquids had significantly higher NRRS and BRS scores in vallecular residue for pudding consistencies when compared to children without aspiration (p < 0.05). No difference was detected in terms of PAS scores and bolus residual parameters between children with and without respiratory problems (p > 0.05). Children with aspiration in liquids have higher scores of BRS and NRRS at the level of vallecular especially in pudding consistencies. VFSE findings for bolus residue did not show significant relation with respiratory problems. Respiratory morbidity in children with EA is multifactorial and may not only explained by bolus residuals and aspiration.

The Role of Oral Feeding Time and Sham Feeding on Oropharyngeal Swallowing Functions in Children with Esophageal Atresia.

A retrospective study was performed to evaluate the role of oral feeding (OF) time and sham feeding (SF) on oral-pharyngeal swallowing functions in children with esophageal atresia (EA). Patients with EA were evaluated for age, sex, and types of atresia, time to start OF and surgical complications. Three to six weeks after full OF, videofluoroscopic swallowing evaluation (VFSE) was performed, and Penetration Aspiration Score (PAS, no aspiration = 1, penetration = 2-5, aspiration = 6-8), delay in swallowing reflex and residue after liquid and pudding consistency were noted. Patients were divided into three groups according to repair time; early primary repair (EPR, < 1 month of age), delayed primary repair (DPR, ≥ 1 month of age) and colonic interposition (CI). VFSE findings were compared between groups. In CI group, patients without aspiration in VFSE were encouraged to sham SF before CI. Patients with and without SF in CI group were also compared for oro-pharyngeal dysphagia (OPD). PAS scores were significantly higher in DPR (n = 13) group when compared to CI group (n = 12) in liquid swallowing (p = 0.032) and higher than EPR (n = 30) in pudding consistency (p = 0.03). Patients with CI showed significant OPD when compared to EPR (p = 0.017). Swallowing reflex delay was similar in both groups (p > 0.05). DPR group had significantly higher liquid residue at the level of vallecula (p = 0.028). The residue at other levels (oral, tongue base, pharyngeal wall and pyriform sinus) were similar in all groups in both liquid and pudding consistencies. There was no significant difference between sham-fed (n = 6) and not sham-fed (n = 6) infants in VFSE of OPD (p > 0.05). Patients with DPR without SF had significantly higher incidence of OPD and PAS scores when compared to EPR and CI. Although CI groups has the latest OF time, SF may improve oral motor abilities and cause better OF swallowing functions than patients with delayed repair.

Assessment of swallowing function in pediatric patients with Wilson's disease: Results of a videofluoroscopic swallowing study.

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: Wilson's disease (WD) is a complex disorder related to copper metabolism and neurological involvement may lead to swallowing disorders. The purpose of this study was to evaluate swallowing function in pediatric patients with WD by using videofluoroscopic swallowing study (VFSS). PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 21 patients were included in the study, prospectively. The VFSS was conducted to evaluate swallowing function of the patients. The penetration-aspiration scale (PAS) was used to assess penetration-aspiration severity. RESULTS: According to the VFSS, abnormal results were detected in nine patients (42.9%) with WD. Of these nine patients, oral phase dysfunction was present in one patient, laryngeal penetration was present in one patient and moreover, abnormal esophageal body function was detected in all nine patients. Of these nine patients, five had neurological presentation at the time of diagnosis, and remaining four patients had hepatic presentation. Mean PAS score of the patients was 1. CONCLUSION: The current study results suggest that subclinical swallowing dysfunction may be observed in patients with either neurological or hepatic WD. Further studies are necessary to reveal the real incidence of esophageal phase problems of swallowing function in pediatric patients with WD.

The functional chewing training for chewing dysfunction in children with repaired EA-TEF.

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: Chewing disorders (CD) may cause restrictions in solid food intake and can be seen in 37% of children with esophageal atresia-tracheoesophageal fistula (EA-TEF). The Functional Chewing Training (FCT) is a holistic approach to improve chewing function (CF) in children. The study aimed to evaluate the effects of FCT on CF in children with EA-TEF. METHODS: Twenty children with CD were included. Patients received 12 weeks FCT including impairment-based and adaptive components. Chewing performance level was scored with Karaduman Chewing Performance Scale (KCPS), and tolerated food texture was determined by the International Dysphagia Diet Standardization Initiative (IDDSI). The baseline and final levels of KCPS and IDDSI were compared to evaluate the effects of FCT on CF. RESULTS: Forty-five percent of cases were isolated-EA, and 55% were EA-distal TEF with a median age of 31 (min = 25, max = 84) months, of which 65% (n = 13) were male. Baseline evaluation showed that 12 cases were in level-1, 6 cases in level-3 and 2 cases in level-4 according to KCPS. Eight children with CD (40%) had IDDSI level-3 and 12 (60%) had level-7. There was a significant improvement in KCPS scores and IDDSI scores after 12 weeks of training (p < 0.01, p = 0.005,respectively). KCPS scores showed level-0 in 15 cases, and level-1 in 5 cases. All children had IDSSI level-7. CONCLUSIONS: The FCT is an effective method to improve chewing function in children EA-TEF who had CD. TYPE OF STUDY: Single group treatment study. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 4.

Timing of Dysphagia Screening in Alzheimer's Dementia.

BACKGROUND: Dysphagia is an important and frequent symptom in Alzheimer's dementia (AD). We hypothesized that dysphagia could be seen in the early stages of AD and sarcopenia presence rather than the severity of the AD affecting dysphagia. The main aim of this study was to investigate swallowing functions in AD patients according to stages. The second aim was to investigate the correlation between sarcopenia and dysphagia in AD. METHODS: This study involved 76 probable AD patients. For all participants, diagnosis of sarcopenia was based on definitions from the revised version of European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People at 2018. Dysphagia symptom severity was evaluated by the Turkish version of the Eating Assessment Tool, a videofluoroscopic swallowing study (VFSS) was performed for instrumental evaluation of swallowing. The patients were divided into 3 groups according to the clinical dementia rating (CDR) scale as CDR 1 (mild dementia), CDR 2 (moderate dementia), and CDR 3 (severe dementia). Swallowing evaluation parameters were analyzed between these groups. RESULTS: Mean age was 78.9 ± 6.4 years, and 56.4% were female. Twenty-six patients had mild dementia, 31 patients had moderate dementia, 19 patients had severe dementia (CDR 3). We found that sarcopenia rates were similar between AD stages according to CDR in our study population and dysphagia could be seen in every stage of AD. In a multivariate analysis, polypharmacy and sarcopenia were found to be independently associated factors for dysphagia, irrespective of stage of AD (OR: 6.1, CI: 1.57-23.9, P = 0.009; OR: 4.9, CI: 1.24-19.6, P = 0.023, respectively). CONCLUSION: Aspirations may be subtle so that AD patients and caregivers may not be aware of swallowing difficulties. Therefore, all AD patients, especially those who have polypharmacy and/or sarcopenia (probable-sarcopenia-severe sarcopenia), should be screened for dysphagia in every stage.

The Effects of Different Exercise Trainings on Suprahyoid Muscle Activation, Tongue Pressure Force and Dysphagia Limit in Healthy Subjects.

Suprahyoid muscle activation and tongue pressure force play a critical role for swallowing function. In addition, dysphagia limit is one of most important factors indicating swallowing efficiency. The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of 8-week training sessions of three different exercises including chin tuck against resistance (CTAR), Shaker exercises and chin tuck exercise with theraband on suprahyoid muscle activity, anterior tongue pressure and dysphagia limit in healthy subjects. Thirty-six healthy volunteers aged between 18 and 40 years who scored below 3 points from Turkish version of Eating Assessment Tool (T-EAT-10) were included in the study, and all participants were divided into three groups randomly. Maximal suprahyoid muscle activations and dysphagia limit of participants were assessed by superficial electromyography. CTAR and chin tuck exercise with theraband increased the maximum suprahyoid muscle activation (p1 = 0.004, p2 = 0.018), whereas Shaker exercise did not increase maximal suprahyoid muscle activation (p = 0.507) after exercise training. CTAR and chin tuck exercise with theraband increased tongue pressure (p1 = 0.045, p2 = 0.041), while Shaker exercise did not increase anterior tongue pressure (p = 0.248). There was no statistically significant difference in dysphagia limits in three groups between before and after exercise training (p > 0.05). As a result, although CTAR seems to be the most effective exercise in most parameters, chin tuck exercise with theraband can also be used as an alternative to CTAR to improve suprahyoid muscle activity and tongue pressure.

The effects of physical activity on sleep quality, job satisfaction, and quality of life in office workers.

BACKGROUND: A sedentary lifestyle has negative effects on many aspects of life. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine the effects of physical activity on sleep quality, job satisfaction, and quality of life in office workers. METHODS: A convenience sample of office workers from administrative staff of a university was included. There were two groups; Group I did regular physical activity for at least eight weeks, and Group II did no regular physical activity. Sleep quality, job satisfaction, and quality of life were assessed using the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index, the Minnesota Job Satisfaction Scale, and the World Health Organization Quality-of-Life-Scale (WHOQOL-BREF), respectively. RESULTS: Group I included 59 individuals and Group II 50 individuals. No significant differences were found between groups in terms of age, height, weight, and the period of time worked (p > 0.05). Although no significant difference was found in terms of sleep quality (p = 0.52), the overall job satisfaction of Group I was higher than Group II (p = 0.03). All subscales of the WHOQOL-BREF for Group I was higher than Group II (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Regular physical activity could increase job satisfaction and quality of life for office workers. Further studies investigating the effect of physical activity in terms of its type, duration should be performed.

The Ability of the Eating Assessment Tool-10 to Detect Aspiration in Patients With Neurological Disorders.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Dysphagia is common in patients with neurological disorders. There is a need to identify patients at risk early by a useful clinical tool to prevent its serious complications. The study aims to determine the ability of the Turkish version of Eating Assessment Tool-10 (T-EAT-10) to detect aspiration in patients with neurological disorders. METHODS: Two hundred fifty-nine patients with neurological disorders who had complaints about swallowing difficulty and referred for a swallowing evaluation were included. Oropharyngeal dysphagia was evaluated with the T-EAT-10 and videofluoroscopic swallowing study in the same day. The penetration-aspiration scale (PAS) was used to document the penetration and aspiration severity. RESULTS: The mean age of the patients was 59.72 ± 17.24 years (minimum [min] = 18, maximum [max] = 96), of which 57.1% were male. The mean T-EAT-10 of patients who had aspiration (PAS > 5) was 25.91 ± 10.31 (min = 1, max = 40) and the mean T-EAT-10 of patients who did not have aspiration (PAS < 6) was 15.70 ± 10.54 (min = 0, max = 40) (P < 0.001). Patients with a T-EAT-10 score higher than 15 were 2.4 times more likely to aspirate. A linear correlation was found between T-EAT-10 and PAS scores of the patients (r = 0.416, P < 0.001). The sensitivity of a T-EAT-10 higher than 15 in detecting aspiration was 81.0% and the specificity was 58.0%. A T-EAT-10 score of higher than 15 has a positive predictive value of 72.0% and a negative predictive value of 69.0%. CONCLUSION: The T-EAT-10 can be used to detect unsafe airway protection in neurology clinics to identify and refer dysphagic patients for further evaluation.

Alterations in hyolaryngeal elevation after esophageal anastomosis: A possible mechanism for airway aspiration.

AIM: A prospective study was performed to evaluate anatomical alterations and hyolaryngeal elevation (HE) by videofluoroscopic swallowing study (VFSS) in patients with esophageal atresia-tracheoesophageal fistula (EA-TEF). METHODS: Patients operated for EA-TEF were evaluated for age, sex, type of atresia and time to esophageal anastomosis. All patients were evaluated by videofluoroscopic swallowing study (VFSS). Penetration-Aspiration scale (PAS≥7 is considered as aspiration), distance between upper esophageal sphincter and 2nd cervical vertebrae (UES-C2) and hyolaryngeal elevation (HE) were evaluated by the same deglutitionist who was blind to the study. The results of EA-TEF patients were compared with healthy children. RESULTS: Eighteen patients with EA-TEF and 10 healthy controls were included. The median age was 16months (12-36m) in EA-TEF and 18months (13-51m) in controls. Male-to-female ratio was 5:4 and 4:1 respectively. 12 of cases were isolated-EA, 1 of them was EA-proximal TEF and 5 of the cases were EA-distal TEF. Half of the cases had primary EAN and others underwent delayed esophageal repair. Early oral feeding was also started in 9 patients (50%) whereas others had delayed oral feeding. VFSS showed aspiration in 27.7 (n=5) of cases (PAS≥7) in EA group. The median distance between UES-C2 was 3.04cm (min: 2.17-max: 3.94) in EA and 4.17cm (min: 3.45-max: 6.24cm) in controls. Median distance for HE was 0.37cm (min: 0.18-max: 1.1cm) in EA and 1.15 (min: 0.61-max: 1.06cm) in controls. The distance between UES-C2 was significantly lower than controls (p<0.05) and HE was decreased in EA-TEF without any statistical significance. CONCLUSION: Children with EA-TEF had shortened distance between airway and upper esophagus. HE may be inefficient to protect airway during deglutition. Anatomical alterations after EAN suggest that airway problems may be related with decreased HE in children with EATEF. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II (Development of diagnostic criteria in a consecutive series of patients and a universally applied "gold standard").

Pediatric Eating Assessment Tool-10 as an indicator to predict aspiration in children with esophageal atresia.

AIM: Airway aspiration is a common problem in children with esophageal atresia (EA). Pediatric Eating Assessment Tool-10 (pEAT-10) is a self-administered questionnaire to evaluate dysphagia symptoms in children. A prospective study was performed to evaluate the validity of pEAT-10 to predict aspiration in children with EA. METHODS: Patients with EA were evaluated for age, sex, type of atresia, presence of associated anomalies, type of esophageal repair, time of definitive treatment, and the beginning of oral feeding. Penetration-aspiration score (PAS) was evaluated with videofluoroscopy (VFS) and parents were surveyed for pEAT-10, dysphagia score (DS) and functional oral intake scale (FOIS). PAS scores greater than 7 were considered as risk of aspiration. EAT-10 values greater than 3 were assessed as abnormal. Higher DS scores shows dysphagia whereas higher FOIS shows better feeding abilities. RESULTS: Forty patients were included. Children with PAS greater than 7 were assessed as PAS+ group, and scores less than 7 were constituted as PAS- group. Demographic features and results of surgical treatments showed no difference between groups (p>0.05). The median values of PAS, pEAT-10 and DS scores were significantly higher in PAS+ group when compared to PAS- group (p<0.05). The sensitivity and specificity of pEAT-10 to predict aspiration were 88% and 77%, and the positive and negative predictive values were 22% and 11%, respectively. Type-C cases had better pEAT-10 and FOIS scores with respect to type-A cases, and both scores were statistically more reliable in primary repair than delayed repair (p<0.05). Among the postoperative complications, only leakage had impact on DS, pEAT-10, PAS and FOIS scores (p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The pEAT-10 is a valid, simple and reliable tool to predict aspiration in children. Patients with higher pEAT-10 scores should undergo detailed evaluation of deglutitive functions and assessment of risks of aspiration to improve safer feeding strategies. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II (Development of diagnostic criteria in a consecutive series of patients and a universally applied "gold standard").